Constant Content

Thanks for taking the time to respond. Much appreciated. I am hopeful that at some point there is money to be made here. Of the several similar sites I have recently signed up on, this may be the only one on which I have yet to earn any money. That's not the best recommendation for continuation, but...

I am very new. No articles accepted. Lots of frustration. I have only had one rejection, but I started here because of one opportunity that was advertised. To get an article to that client seems to be quite an uphill task: Five articles accepted in the face of a lengthy "approval" process ...

Darned right, you should. But remember, it's their website, and they can be as geeky-tweaky as they want to be. Actually, I am getting more and more discouraged by the day. The fees are definitely attractive, but getting in here is like Snow White being admitted to a witch's convention before she at...

Hi, As I have had only one article reviewed so far, and it was rejected, I may not be the best one to offer advice. But I did notice a couple of things, and the suggestion to step away from the article for a while and come back to it later, fresher, with a seasoned perspective, is probably some valu...

SJH, thanks for the reply. But the most important point raised in my question concerned the use of superscript numeration. It's too late now. I'm going ahead with it and if it doesn't fly, so be it. You are absolutely right about the dictum on URLs. It is a really weak point about this site that ref...

Nowhere do I find any direction on the acceptability of in-text referencing in articles. Assuming it is acceptable, can I use superscript numeration or will the software reject or mutilate it? I don't like the option of more thorough in-text referencing as I feel it disrupts the flow too much. A sim...