Search found 4 matches
- Wed Dec 24, 2014 3:40 pm
- Forum: Common Place
- Topic: Changing the Long Summary on Old Content
- Replies: 0
- Views: 50104
Changing the Long Summary on Old Content
Most of the articles I have sold have 100% of the content in the long summary. In my catalogue I have older articles that have a lower percentage in the long summary. I would like to change the older articles to 100% in the long summary as well, but I cannot figure out how to do it. Can that be done...
- Wed Dec 03, 2014 5:35 am
- Forum: Questions About Rejections
- Topic: Articles rejected for not providing useful info
- Replies: 4
- Views: 27414
Re: Articles rejected for not providing useful info
I decided not to wait any longer and submitted another article this morning. I sure hope it gets accepted!
- Sun Nov 16, 2014 7:46 am
- Forum: Questions About Rejections
- Topic: Articles rejected for not providing useful info
- Replies: 4
- Views: 27414
Re: Articles rejected for not providing useful info
I have received two rejections in a row for not providing useful information. I don't see that the rejected articles are different from ones I have sold. The rejected titles are "Success and Competitiveness" and "Conflicts in Christian Marriages." How can the editors be so sure t...
- Sun Oct 20, 2013 10:24 am
- Forum: Common Place
- Topic: Footnotes and References
- Replies: 1
- Views: 40000
Footnotes and References
I just noticed today that footnotes are no longer permitted in article submissions. I have had articles accepted with footnotes and that raises several questions. Since footnotes are no longer permitted, I would think that references should be fully cited within the text rather than in a bibliograph...