Hi Ed,
The rejection says to re-submit with a short summary, but I did include a short summary in the appropriate section,
which was under the extra note to editor that I added as way of explanation. Should I not have put my note to you
in the short summary area? I'm wondering if you just didn't see the short summary below it? Or maybe the summary
just didn't make it through for some reason?
Thanks,
Sarita
Raw Cat Food article rejected - question
Moderators: Celeste Stewart, Ed, Constant
Re: Raw Cat Food article rejected - question
Hi Ed,
I realized it was a little silly to wait when all I need to do is just re-submit and double check to make sure the short summary is there.
I did have to change the title as it said the title was already in use.
Thanks,
Sarita
I realized it was a little silly to wait when all I need to do is just re-submit and double check to make sure the short summary is there.
I did have to change the title as it said the title was already in use.
Thanks,
Sarita
Re: Raw Cat Food article rejected - question
I don't know if the editors read the forum posts these days. At one time we did get very useful feed back from Ed here, but then we were told that they were no longer allowed to post here, which I believe was a result of a jump in volume. There is a space on the resubmission form for leaving a note for them (or there was some time back when I last used one).
Re: Raw Cat Food article rejected - question
Thanks, Jak
I guess we'll just see how it goes. I appreciate you responding.
Sarita
I guess we'll just see how it goes. I appreciate you responding.
Sarita