Continuation of Satire Discussion
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 8:07 pm
In the Constructive Criticism thread, a conversation started there which belongs in its own thread.
[quote="HayleyWriter"]Perhaps you're right and good humour is more generally acceptable than the stronger satire format. I don't know who this guy from The Onion is who you keep quoting but surely this is not your only authority on satire?[/quote]
No, he's just the one on the people who got me thinking in new directions. When I first tried writing satire, I wrote in general terms. I didn't quote anyone, didn't mention names, tried to be too politically correct. None of my pieces did very well.
At that point, I was already writing comedy. I wrote poetry, a few short stories, and was submitting them to a website for feedback. My first satire piece was called "Wicca Finally Proven to Be Hoax," and its original form was pretty drab and boring. It sat for weeks, hardly getting any reviews. Finally, someone familiar with the field did a line by line edit, and gave me an honest review. Needless to say, it wasn't a very "good" review, but it was one of the most helpful I've ever gotten. I revised the piece five different times before finally settling on its final version.
That final version actually did well in the ratings, and got far more reviews.
(Just for clarification. I've been studying religions since I was thirteen. They fascinate me in their similarity to each other, while people fight over their differences.)
[quote="HayleyWriter"]Perhaps you're right and good humour is more generally acceptable than the stronger satire format. I don't know who this guy from The Onion is who you keep quoting but surely this is not your only authority on satire?[/quote]
No, he's just the one on the people who got me thinking in new directions. When I first tried writing satire, I wrote in general terms. I didn't quote anyone, didn't mention names, tried to be too politically correct. None of my pieces did very well.
At that point, I was already writing comedy. I wrote poetry, a few short stories, and was submitting them to a website for feedback. My first satire piece was called "Wicca Finally Proven to Be Hoax," and its original form was pretty drab and boring. It sat for weeks, hardly getting any reviews. Finally, someone familiar with the field did a line by line edit, and gave me an honest review. Needless to say, it wasn't a very "good" review, but it was one of the most helpful I've ever gotten. I revised the piece five different times before finally settling on its final version.
That final version actually did well in the ratings, and got far more reviews.
(Just for clarification. I've been studying religions since I was thirteen. They fascinate me in their similarity to each other, while people fight over their differences.)