Hi,
I have a question: When referring to an institution, does CC prefer strict adherence to subject-verb agreement or is the NYT approach OK? For example, NYT approach (to avoid awkward references):
Purdue University's admission requirements include multiple criteria. They look for a 4.0 GPA, blah, blah, blah.
or (strict adherence): Purdue University's admission requirements include multiple criteria. It looks for a 4.0 GPA, blah, blah, blah.
Subject-verb agreement, New York Times Approach
Moderators: Celeste Stewart, Ed, Constant
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:03 pm
Re: Subject-verb agreement, New York Times Approach
I prefer strict adherence. I think it's clearer, and many style guides/grammar guides agree.
Constant Content is a site for writers. It is always looking for excellent writers.
You can always write with the employees or executives of a company/university in mind.
Purdue University's admission requirements . . . Admissions staff members look for a 4.0 GPA. They . . .
Thanks,
Ed
Constant Content is a site for writers. It is always looking for excellent writers.
You can always write with the employees or executives of a company/university in mind.
Purdue University's admission requirements . . . Admissions staff members look for a 4.0 GPA. They . . .
Thanks,
Ed
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:03 pm
-
- Posts: 561
- Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:42 am
- Location: Moncks Corner, SC
- Contact:
Re: Subject-verb agreement, New York Times Approach
That's what I LOVE about the English language, there is always a way to work around an issue. We may have a ton of insane rules, but there's always wiggle room.