Page 1 of 1

Are review times typical?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 12:39 pm
by AndrewMich
Hello everybody! I am very happy to be apart of this professional community! It has been around one business week since I sent my article for review. I believe the excitement is killing me! :D My question in short is are all review times typical and if an article is rejected does it take another week to review? I am trying to take it slow so i will not submit another article until I hear if my writing is on par with site standard. Thank you all very much for your replies in advance and hope your writing is coming along greatly!



Best regards,
AM

Re: Are review times typical?

Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2011 2:33 pm
by Evelyn
Howdy, Andrew, and welcome!

Check this thread: http://www.constant-content.com/forum/v ... =2&t=23151

There are lots of other discussions around the forum about review times, which are always on the top of our minds. Scroll back a few months in the posts and you'll see everyone's opinions on the subject. :D

See you around, and good luck!

Re: Are review times typical?

Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 7:14 pm
by JoyRCalderwood
You can use the resubmit button unless it's a write-off. That is supposed to save time--sometimes does other times doesn't mean squat.

In the meantime, keep writing so you have several ready to go should you be accepted.

Re: Are review times typical?

Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2011 11:01 am
by AndrewMich
Thank you very much for your great replies. They have helped me alot. Have a terrific day and happy writing!

Best Regards,
AM

Re: Are review times typical?

Posted: Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:31 pm
by AndrewMich
Well my article has been sent back for comma use (I tend to be to generous). But I must say the honest notes from the editor are very helpful rather than negitive which is truley a breathe of motivating fresh air. Although it may take more effort, this site really is professional! Hope everyone elses writing is doing well!

Best Regards,
AM