Page 1 of 1

How does Constant Content decide to kick new authors?

Posted: Mon Oct 31, 2016 6:42 pm
by sed
Hi, I've read that Constant Content is fairly strict and will kick a new author if they make too many mistakes early on. My first article was rejected because I used first person in the short description area, and there was also a single comma missing in my article. It was then approved 20 minutes later after the fixes were made. I'm wondering if I miss more single commas in an article, or make other minor errors, is that grounds for termination?

Thanks for any insights.

Re: How does Constant Content decide to kick new authors?

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:02 am
by constant-content
No, the editing team will not suspend a writer if they make too many mistakes at first. Basically, as long as the writer shows general understanding of grammar and punctuation rules, exhibits a regular commitment to quality, doesn’t plagiarize, corrects all identified errors upon rejection, and strives to improve, that you shouldn't be worried about getting suspended. :wink: