Page 1 of 1

My topic is still in review after 15 days

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 8:27 am
by vinodjose
I posted a topic for the third time on 16th March. It was rejected the previous two times and I rewrote the entire article and submitted on 16th March. Since then it is showing as under review. The previous two times it was rejected within one day, but this time it has been under review for 15 days and is not showing any sign of changing status. How long can a review take?

My topic was Judas Iscariot.

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 8:32 am
by Ed
The errors in this article have not been corrected. This article has been rejected several times for errors that have been specified in the rejection notices. We cannot accept this article.

Ed

My article is still under review after 15 days.

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:27 am
by vinodjose
I am sorry I do not understand. I have rewritten the entire article.

Your rejection notice only states

"We could not accept your content, "Judas Iscariot"

This article has problems with clarity, sentence structure, punctuation, and capitalization.

Make sure you follow our writer guidelines or your content could be rejected often:"

What exactly does this mean. I have rechecked the punctatuations and even added a few where ever I thought they were relevent. The last time I actually re-wrote the entire article. Has any one checked it this time. What is the exact reason for rejection. I have checked and re-checked for the errors mentioned in your rejection notices. Please specify

My article is still under review after 15 days.

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:28 am
by vinodjose
I am sorry I do not understand. I have rewritten the entire article.

Your rejection notice only states

"We could not accept your content, "Judas Iscariot"

This article has problems with clarity, sentence structure, punctuation, and capitalization.

Make sure you follow our writer guidelines or your content could be rejected often:"

What exactly does this mean. I have rechecked the punctatuations and even added a few where ever I thought they were relevent. The last time I actually re-wrote the entire article. Has any one checked it this time. What is the exact reason for rejection. I have checked and re-checked for the errors mentioned in your rejection notices. Please specify

Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2008 9:32 am
by Ed
Your article still contains errors with punctuation, grammar, spelling and capitalization. This article does not meet Constant Content's standards. Please seek another market.

Ed

Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2008 3:37 am
by J. A. Young
The editors have time to only give you an overall assessment of issues...they do not pinpoint specific paragraphs/sentences/words the way a proof-reader might. Your best bet is to have a friend proof the article for you and help you locate the specific problems. Good luck.