Permanent suspensions
Posted: Sun Jun 09, 2013 11:39 am
I was just thinking, there have recently been a lot of posts from people who are shocked at suddenly being permanently suspended for a sloppy article, after initially having a few acceptances. So these don't seem to be people who just are not able to write an acceptable article. I imagine that they are probably unsure what standards are going to be applied to their work.
Given there is evidently not enough time for a detailed critique to be given in these cases, would it not be fairer at least to give a final warning before permanently suspending someone?
Given there is evidently not enough time for a detailed critique to be given in these cases, would it not be fairer at least to give a final warning before permanently suspending someone?