Posted as a publisher for writers information
Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2006 10:43 am
As I understand Constant Content has four types of license.
1) Free works for websites who freely refer visitors to outside links and need your form of content.
2) Usage gives the right to use as is, but you may be banned by Yahoo and Google for "Duplicate Content."
3) Unique, if you are the first to buy and download, avoids this ban, but doesn't allow you to link internally or edit or remove writers name. If someone else has purchased usage first you lose.
4) Full Rights is the only way a website can buy and only if no one has downloaded content first. IF SOMEONE HAS THE BUYER MUST RE-WRITE THE ARTICLE OR MODIFY IT AND BREAK IT DOWN. THIS MAY TAKE MORE TIME THAN SELF AUTHORING. If some writers think that a publisher will spend top dollar for FULL RIGHTS to a general fluff article with little research, sorry.
We have thousands of articles on site and will be launching additional sites in 2007. Anything other than FULL RIGHTS doesn't work for us. We would like to depend more on "Our Own" content rather than syndicated content which we license, but not at any cost.
1) Free works for websites who freely refer visitors to outside links and need your form of content.
2) Usage gives the right to use as is, but you may be banned by Yahoo and Google for "Duplicate Content."
3) Unique, if you are the first to buy and download, avoids this ban, but doesn't allow you to link internally or edit or remove writers name. If someone else has purchased usage first you lose.
4) Full Rights is the only way a website can buy and only if no one has downloaded content first. IF SOMEONE HAS THE BUYER MUST RE-WRITE THE ARTICLE OR MODIFY IT AND BREAK IT DOWN. THIS MAY TAKE MORE TIME THAN SELF AUTHORING. If some writers think that a publisher will spend top dollar for FULL RIGHTS to a general fluff article with little research, sorry.
We have thousands of articles on site and will be launching additional sites in 2007. Anything other than FULL RIGHTS doesn't work for us. We would like to depend more on "Our Own" content rather than syndicated content which we license, but not at any cost.