Brians' Errors

A place where authors can exchange ideas or thoughts. Talk about what categories are hot and which ones are not.

Moderators: Celeste Stewart, Ed

Ed
Posts: 4686
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:15 pm

Brians' Errors

Post by Ed »

No, these aren't errors Brians makes. These are common errors writers make that Brians has compiled.

I use this list frequently to point out errors such as the use of compliment in place of complement or edition in place of addition, for example.

You may find Brians' Errors useful:
http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/errors.html

Ed
AnneM
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:08 am

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by AnneM »

I'll have a peek at this later but there are two that really get my hair standing on end.

loose instead of lose - I mean how the nuts are you going to loose weight? I have been trying to visualize it for ages and I can't come up with an image yet lol

then instead of than

Those two seem to be an epidemic if you ask me.
Ed
Posts: 4686
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:15 pm

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by Ed »

"Loose" is especially hilarious in certain circumstances.

Along the same lines, because lose sounds like looz a lot of writers use chose for choose!
CRDonovan
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 6:39 am
Location: Vermont

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by CRDonovan »

Thanks for this link, Ed. My own nemesis is affect and effect. I will go miles out of my way to avoid using either of these words. No matter how many times I consult Websters, I still cringe with the horrible feeling that I'm using the wrong one. And can I just say that this makes me gnash my teeth? You look up affect: it says "to have an effect on". Quit torturing me!!!
Ed
Posts: 4686
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:15 pm

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by Ed »

I agree - nauseatingly unhelpful.
Sharion
Posts: 238
Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 3:24 pm

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by Sharion »

Sounds like fodder for a humerous article :D
AnneM
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 5:08 am

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by AnneM »

Ugh! I just saw "loose" again!!! And it was on a self-help site for a company that sells a massive amount of self help CDs. I mean with the millions they make they can't afford to pay someone to proofread their web copy? Seriously! Let's all "loose weight" together...
Celeste Stewart
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:28 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by Celeste Stewart »

CR, the way I remember affect/effect is with "special effects" in mind. When in doubt, I remember that we often discuss "special effects" as things such as, "What did you think about those cool special effects?" That reminds me that effect is a thing (noun). Therefore, "effect" (the noun) doesn't make sense in a sentence such as, "Nancy's attitude positively affects the other students."
ecdoran
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 3:44 pm

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by ecdoran »

I remember affect/effect because it's in alphabetical order. Affect is to change or alter something and Effect is the result of the changes. Does that make sense to anyone but me?
Celeste Stewart
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:28 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by Celeste Stewart »

Makes sense: affect equals alter, effect = result.

The hurricane affected (altered) cities throughout Florida. Its effect (result) crippled communications statewide and cut power to millions.
Debbi
Posts: 738
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:58 am
Location: New Mexico

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by Debbi »

To be picky, I have to point out that sometimes affect is a noun (The psychiatric patient presented with a flat affect) and effect can be a verb (The politician promised to effect change after his election). But these are rare and specialized cases and seldom found in web content writing.

I see "loose" everywhere and it makes me want to scream! And it can be ambigious too. If someone says "Close the door! I might lose my dog." or "Close the door! I might loose my dog.", you don't konw if they're worried about their dog escaping or if they are gonig to tell it to attack you.

Another thing I see in blogs and even in some articles is people writing "there" when they mean "their" and vice versa. Less commonly, "are" and "our" and "here" and "hear" but I have seen it. I'm sure this is mostly typos from homophones that spellcheck doesn't catch, but it sure doesn't belong in professional writing.
CRDonovan
Posts: 248
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 6:39 am
Location: Vermont

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by CRDonovan »

Thanks for the tips on straightening affect/effect Celeste and ecdoran. It's gotta help. I particularly like the one which sorts them alphabetically -
my brain likes that sort of thing.

But then we had to stir the pot... [quote]To be picky, I have to point out that sometimes affect is a noun (The psychiatric patient presented with a flat affect) and effect can be a verb (The politician promised to effect change after his election). But these are rare and specialized cases and seldom found in web content writing.[/quote]
ARRRGH!

LOL!
Celeste Stewart
Posts: 3528
Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 5:28 pm
Location: California
Contact:

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by Celeste Stewart »

If English is tough for us natives, no wonder ESL writers struggle.
Debbi
Posts: 738
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:58 am
Location: New Mexico

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by Debbi »

Nothing is ever simple, is it? Sometimes when I'm reseraching an article I think "hey, this will be easy. These three references all say the same thing about this topic." Then I look at a fourth reference and it says something completely different! Argh, I am then focusing on finding out exactly what is the "truth" and wondering if there is such a thing.......
KateDaniels
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 5:25 pm

Re: Brians' Errors

Post by KateDaniels »

The ones I cringe at the most are there, they're and their. Whenever I see these used inappropriately it changes my opinion entirely about the site, article or writer. Linda
Locked