Possible new category discussion?
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 11:00 am
Been toying with an idea and wonder what others think about it.
Many times I'll write an article on a topic that doesn't actually fit anywhere, and it hit me last night that maybe we need a category for "Feature articles" that are similar to newspaper feature articles. I have no journalism training but I know some of CC's other writers do and maybe they can try to figure out what I'm talking about (I may not always be able to put my finger on exactly what I mean but I do know what I don't mean. Kind of like a pre-schooler.). They are informative yet maybe have a different style? Not afraid to show some personality or humor, but they're not humor articles; or have a serious perspective, subtly injecting opinions. Not like first person, but, for example, using a sentence like "The white man decimated the buffalo herds and rounded up the Indians, restricting them to reservations and plying them with alcohol blah blah blah..." Not that that's a good sentence but it definitely shows a personal viewpoint staked out by the writer.
We all write informational articles that should have no personality, for example, in response to requests, but sometimes I get ideas that allow a different style -- casual, a little bit of humor, in a way that reveals the writer a little more. As an example, I had fun researching the Craig of craigslist - he is a unique character, a wise-cracking introvert -- so I allowed a little humor into the article. I'm sure I'm not the only one who gets this little itch sometimes.
After the journalists on the forum analyze what I mean, I'd like to know if anyone thinks "Features" (or a more accurate name?) could be its own category. Would there be a demand? What are others' experiences?
Thanks.
Many times I'll write an article on a topic that doesn't actually fit anywhere, and it hit me last night that maybe we need a category for "Feature articles" that are similar to newspaper feature articles. I have no journalism training but I know some of CC's other writers do and maybe they can try to figure out what I'm talking about (I may not always be able to put my finger on exactly what I mean but I do know what I don't mean. Kind of like a pre-schooler.). They are informative yet maybe have a different style? Not afraid to show some personality or humor, but they're not humor articles; or have a serious perspective, subtly injecting opinions. Not like first person, but, for example, using a sentence like "The white man decimated the buffalo herds and rounded up the Indians, restricting them to reservations and plying them with alcohol blah blah blah..." Not that that's a good sentence but it definitely shows a personal viewpoint staked out by the writer.
We all write informational articles that should have no personality, for example, in response to requests, but sometimes I get ideas that allow a different style -- casual, a little bit of humor, in a way that reveals the writer a little more. As an example, I had fun researching the Craig of craigslist - he is a unique character, a wise-cracking introvert -- so I allowed a little humor into the article. I'm sure I'm not the only one who gets this little itch sometimes.
After the journalists on the forum analyze what I mean, I'd like to know if anyone thinks "Features" (or a more accurate name?) could be its own category. Would there be a demand? What are others' experiences?
Thanks.