A Bit Worried
Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 3:20 pm
I am new to C-C. I have submitted three articles, and all three of them have been returned to me to make changes. With the first, I was sloppy and I admit it. I have always loved writing and wanted to make a living off it, so attempting to sell my work was not a stretch. But I joined the day after I lost my job, and I was in something approaching a panic at the time. I was a bad, bad author and I didn't read the rules about formatting. When I received the message to read the formatting rules, I fixed the problem, resubmitted and was accepted. I have since received an offer on that work.
At the time I had submitted two articles, and when I got my first rejection I immediately went and fixed the formatting on the other too. I got another rejection based on a misspelling in my title. It was arguable that the misspelling was really just an alternate but generally acceptable spelling, but I still fixed it, resubmitted, was accepted and have sold a usage for that article.
On to article three, submitted, rejected for run-ons. (I think) I fixed that one too, but now I'm scared to submit it, for multiple reasons. For one, I've seen mentions of a three-strikes policy here on rejections. I've already been rejected three times, and I don't particularly want to be banned, especially not when I have sold an article and received an offer on another.
I suppose this post is more of an epic on my frustration with myself. I have completely understood every rejection I have received, so I'm not arguing that my articles should not have been rejected. The first rejection was the result of my own initial eagerness, mixed with desperation. From then on, they were honest mistakes, but mistakes nonetheless. I proofread both articles before submission but still missed things that the editor caught. I guess I'm just not certain what to do from here on out. The mistakes are mine, but with three articles and three rejections (two of which, when the issues were addressed, resulted in interest from buyers), I don't want to continue to waste editor time, but I also don't want to sell myself short.
I know I have the ability to write articles that buyers want, I've already proved that. But it bothers me (and embarrasses me) that I've had to be rejected once on every article to do it. Andi t doesn't bother/embarrass me because I can't handle rejection ... it bothers and embarrasses me because I feel I am wasting someone else's time. I'm sure editors here have better things to do then hold my hand. Does anyone have any suggestions for me? I AM proofreading my articles, but I'm still missing things that lead to rejection. Should I just give up on it for now and come back later if I feel my proofreading and/or writing abilities have improved? Perhaps what frustrates me the most is that I know I'm a both a good writer and a good editor ... people come to me to edit their work all the time, I've even been paid for my editing skills. Both writing and editing are talents I possess, yet I can't seem to do for my own work what comes so easily for me to do with the work of others. Why can't I seem to effectively edit my own writing?
At the time I had submitted two articles, and when I got my first rejection I immediately went and fixed the formatting on the other too. I got another rejection based on a misspelling in my title. It was arguable that the misspelling was really just an alternate but generally acceptable spelling, but I still fixed it, resubmitted, was accepted and have sold a usage for that article.
On to article three, submitted, rejected for run-ons. (I think) I fixed that one too, but now I'm scared to submit it, for multiple reasons. For one, I've seen mentions of a three-strikes policy here on rejections. I've already been rejected three times, and I don't particularly want to be banned, especially not when I have sold an article and received an offer on another.
I suppose this post is more of an epic on my frustration with myself. I have completely understood every rejection I have received, so I'm not arguing that my articles should not have been rejected. The first rejection was the result of my own initial eagerness, mixed with desperation. From then on, they were honest mistakes, but mistakes nonetheless. I proofread both articles before submission but still missed things that the editor caught. I guess I'm just not certain what to do from here on out. The mistakes are mine, but with three articles and three rejections (two of which, when the issues were addressed, resulted in interest from buyers), I don't want to continue to waste editor time, but I also don't want to sell myself short.
I know I have the ability to write articles that buyers want, I've already proved that. But it bothers me (and embarrasses me) that I've had to be rejected once on every article to do it. Andi t doesn't bother/embarrass me because I can't handle rejection ... it bothers and embarrasses me because I feel I am wasting someone else's time. I'm sure editors here have better things to do then hold my hand. Does anyone have any suggestions for me? I AM proofreading my articles, but I'm still missing things that lead to rejection. Should I just give up on it for now and come back later if I feel my proofreading and/or writing abilities have improved? Perhaps what frustrates me the most is that I know I'm a both a good writer and a good editor ... people come to me to edit their work all the time, I've even been paid for my editing skills. Both writing and editing are talents I possess, yet I can't seem to do for my own work what comes so easily for me to do with the work of others. Why can't I seem to effectively edit my own writing?