Not Getting it

A place where authors can exchange ideas or thoughts. Talk about what categories are hot and which ones are not.

Moderators: Celeste Stewart, Ed

Jaye
Posts: 50
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 2:14 am
Location: Ireland

Re: Not Getting it

Post by Jaye »

Joy - Perhaps that 'not' in the editor's sentence is a typo. Do you think the editor meant to write 'now' instead of 'not'? That would explain an otherwise mysterious sentence.
webscribe
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:48 am

Re: Not Getting it

Post by webscribe »

I think jaye is right. The editors probably meant now and not not. Now would make a lot more sense.

I think that, much of the time, writers just instinctively feel that something's wrong when they're mixing their metaphors. They edit them out without really knowing why. I can sort of explain why because I teach writing, but I still catch myself mixing my metaphors. What's worse is that sometimes I don't catch myself until it's too late! There's nothing so awful as finding a boo-boo in something that's already in print :( .
BarryDavidson
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:10 am

Re: Not Getting it

Post by BarryDavidson »

I'm still of the "old school" of thought on this issue. I love clichés, metaphors, idioms, etc. The "new school" of writing is death on those delightful turns of phrase. I actually got a bad review once because the reviewer thought one of my lines was too cliché-like. Of course I was a little angry at the time, but instead of letting it run away with me I wrote a short story almost entirely in clichés instead. (That story won fifty dollars, and got me my second publishing contract.)

In this particular context however, it's either write it the way the editors want it or it gets rejected.
webscribe
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:48 am

Re: Not Getting it

Post by webscribe »

I love the idea of writing something entirely in cliches! Can you/are you allowed to leave us a link to your story?
BarryDavidson
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:10 am

Re: Not Getting it

Post by BarryDavidson »

I haven't had a problems with links to my creative writing here... http://www.thenextbigwriter.com/tnbw_pu ... liche.html
Evelyn
Posts: 245
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Not Getting it

Post by Evelyn »

Barry, can I put your link on my Facebook? All my old friends from my MFA class would get a kick out of your story. :D
BarryDavidson
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:10 am

Re: Not Getting it

Post by BarryDavidson »

Evelyn wrote:Barry, can I put your link on my Facebook? All my old friends from my MFA class would get a kick out of your story. :D
No problem... What's an MFA class?
Judith
Posts: 262
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 11:30 am
Location: I may be found where mountains rise and rivers flow.
Contact:

Re: Not Getting it

Post by Judith »

MFA = Master of Fine Arts
Evelyn
Posts: 245
Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:39 pm
Contact:

Re: Not Getting it

Post by Evelyn »

Yep, Master of Fine Arts and class as in "Class of '99" because it was lots and lots of classes. :)
BarryDavidson
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:10 am

Re: Not Getting it

Post by BarryDavidson »

I hated my college writing and literature courses, with the sole exception of one. The rest were mostly taught by a high school adjunct, or by the department head - a 30 year old PHD who cut everything up so badly you couldn't enjoy reading it, and wrote more on your papers than you did. I was an art major, and the fall I started all the art teachers left leaving only the department head. He would assign work, and then criticize the subject matter used. He also had an iron-clad attendance policy.
webscribe
Posts: 33
Joined: Thu Nov 25, 2010 8:48 am

Re: Not Getting it

Post by webscribe »

BD, your story is quite a display of virtuosity. You're a true wordsmith! I loved it when ". . . the sum of all evil lurked in the shadows . . ."
ThisOldMan
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:05 pm
Location: Thailand, where bombs and bullets are not news.

Re: Not Getting it

Post by ThisOldMan »

Goodness, BD, that's some writing alright. Reminded me of a song in my country with lyrics 100% made up of titles from other songs. Rode the charts for quite a while, too.
BarryDavidson
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:10 am

Re: Not Getting it

Post by BarryDavidson »

I wrote that particular piece because I was mad, and wanted to thumb my nose at the new crop of reviewers who have been taught that anything which hints at clichés or colloquialisms is bad. I really got to thumb my nose at them when it won the quarterly short story contest, not to mention the fifty bucks that came with it.

It was also the first 'comedy' piece I ever wrote. After that I started writing more humor, and wound up winning a few more contests.
ThisOldMan
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Jan 22, 2011 2:05 pm
Location: Thailand, where bombs and bullets are not news.

Re: Not Getting it

Post by ThisOldMan »

Should get angry more often then.
BarryDavidson
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:10 am

Re: Not Getting it

Post by BarryDavidson »

ThisOldMan wrote:Should get angry more often then.
You can rest assured that I do. Unfortunately, it only does me any good when writing creative pieces. If I use that anger to research an article extensively, cross the i's and dot the t's, there's still a high probability that it'll get called an op/ed piece - even if it article is based entirely on facts. Such is the modern world of writing.
Locked