I was just thinking, there have recently been a lot of posts from people who are shocked at suddenly being permanently suspended for a sloppy article, after initially having a few acceptances. So these don't seem to be people who just are not able to write an acceptable article. I imagine that they are probably unsure what standards are going to be applied to their work.
Given there is evidently not enough time for a detailed critique to be given in these cases, would it not be fairer at least to give a final warning before permanently suspending someone?
Permanent suspensions
Moderators: Celeste Stewart, Ed, Constant
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 10:24 am
Re: Permanent suspensions
UNFAIR SITE
It does not matter here. I had 5 articles accepted here and 3 taken without question, then on my 6th article they permanently suspended me.
It does not matter here. I had 5 articles accepted here and 3 taken without question, then on my 6th article they permanently suspended me.