question

Area for content rejection questions.

Moderators: Celeste Stewart, Ed, Constant

Locked
audrabianca
Posts: 244
Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 12:39 pm

question

Post by audrabianca »

Thanks.

AB
Last edited by audrabianca on Fri May 22, 2009 5:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
BarryDavidson
Posts: 561
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 11:10 am

Re: question

Post by BarryDavidson »

I think that means within the article itself. More than two problems with explaination would equate to "consistent" within a shorter (less than 1500 word) article.
Ed
Posts: 4686
Joined: Mon Feb 20, 2006 2:15 pm

Re: question

Post by Ed »

It often appears that the understanding of the reader and the usefulness of the information is not fully considered upon final draft. Just because an article is short does not mean its supporting elements can be weak. Overall, many of these articles should be given more consideration/time before they are submitted. It all comes back to the old "clarity" refrain.
Locked